Crypto Week Signals Compliance Reckoning for Digital Asset Markets
The U.S. House of Representatives has declared the week of July 14, 2025, as “Crypto Week,” marking a major milestone in Congressional efforts to cement America’s leadership in the global digital asset economy. The House is expected to vote on three critical bills: the CLARITY Act, the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, and the Senate-passed GENIUS Act. While these bills signal growing political consensus around innovation in digital assets, they also introduce a wave of regulatory and compliance obligations that firms must now take seriously. Together, they offer the most comprehensive federal frameworks for digital asset market structure, consumer protection, anti-money laundering compliance, and restrictions on government-issued central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).
GENIUS Act
The centerpiece of the Senate’s work, the GENIUS Act, passed by a strong 68–30 bipartisan vote, establishes a detailed federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins – digital tokens pegged to fiat currency and used for payments. The Act imposes strict eligibility, reserve, and compliance standards on stablecoin issuers. Only federally regulated banks, state-regulated banks with under $10 billion in market cap, and select nonbanks that receive unanimous approval from a new Stablecoin Certification Review Committee (SCRC) may issue compliant stablecoins. The Act mandates 1:1 reserve backing in liquid U.S. assets, monthly reserve disclosures, independent audits, and compliance with Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and anti-money laundering (AML) requirements. Additionally, issuers are prohibited from misrepresenting government backing and must uphold consumer protection standards, including restrictions on tying stablecoin usage to unrelated products and services.
For compliance professionals, the GENIUS Act marks a shift toward bank-like oversight across capital, liquidity, cyber risk, and operational controls. Nonbank issuers, in particular, face a steep climb—requiring governance structures, audit-ready reserves, and enterprise-grade risk management to win regulatory approval. Compliance teams should begin now by evaluating how existing legal entities align with licensure requirements, upgrading KYC and blockchain surveillance protocols, and ensuring treasury practices can support liquidity stress events. Enhanced vendor due diligence is also essential, particularly where third parties such as custodians or wallet providers touch reserves or end-users.
The GENIUS Act also introduces potential conflict-of-interest concerns that firms must address. Issuers with affiliated trading desks, custodians, or significant insider token holdings should institute robust information barriers and pre-clearance processes to avoid perceived or real conflicts. Firms will need clear codes of conduct that apply to digital assets, well-documented related-party transaction review policies, and transparency into how fees and incentives are structured, particularly where sponsor compensation is paid from the underlying assets themselves.
Crypto Asset Exchange-Traded Products
In parallel, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued significant guidance on July 1, 2025, for issuers of crypto asset exchange-traded products (ETPs). These investment vehicles, which track spot or derivative crypto assets and are traded on national exchanges, must meet disclosure obligations under Regulations S-K and S-X. The SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance has outlined its expectations on topics ranging from prospectus summaries and risk disclosures to custody practices and conflicts of interest. In particular, issuers must disclose risks unique to crypto markets—such as price volatility, custody breaches, and validator attacks—alongside detailed narratives on how underlying crypto assets function, how net asset value (NAV) is calculated, and what benchmarks are used.
The SEC emphasized the need for issuers to disclose the role and risks of Authorized Participants (APs), identify third-party service providers and custodians, and file material contracts—especially those affecting asset custody or AP relationships. Disclosure must also clarify voting rights (or lack thereof), redemption mechanics, and the sponsor’s ability to suspend issuance or redemptions. Financial statements must be provided not only for the trust, but also separately for each investment series, underscoring the SEC’s push for investor-level transparency.
Critically, the SEC flagged conflict-of-interest disclosures as a core expectation. Issuers must identify whether sponsors or insiders hold related crypto assets, maintain pre-clearance protocols for employees, and disclose whether the sponsor has other competing products or roles in the market. This reflects a broader SEC strategy—led by Commissioner Hester Peirce and the Crypto Task Force—to embed traditional securities law standards in the emerging crypto financial ecosystem.
Is Your Crypto Trading Compliance Program Up to Speed?
Robinhood Tokenization and MiCA Licensing: What It Means for Compliance Teams
Robinhood is charting a new path in digital asset innovation, leveraging Europe’s regulatory environment to expand access to tokenized financial products. With the first Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) license in the European Union, granted by Lithuania in June 2025, Robinhood now offers tokenized U.S. stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to EU investors—a move that signals a significant shift in cross-border financial services.
Under MiCA, retail investors across 30 European countries can access tokenized shares of private companies like OpenAI and SpaceX—an opportunity still restricted to accredited investors in the United States. Robinhood’s dual licensing (MiCA and MiFID) allows it to offer both crypto and traditional securities within a unified platform, while its acquisition of Bitstamp strengthens its infrastructure for crypto derivatives like perpetual futures.
For compliance officers, Robinhood’s entry into this space raises several important themes:
- Regulatory Arbitrage and Licensing: MiCA’s clear, pan-European framework creates an environment where compliant firms can scale rapidly across the EU. Robinhood’s proactive licensing strategy provides a competitive edge and offers a model for others navigating multi-jurisdictional regulatory regimes.
- Product Scope and Disclosure: Robinhood is initially launching over 200 tokenized U.S. equities, supported by dividend functionality and 24/5 trading on Arbitrum, with plans to migrate to its own Layer 2 blockchain. However, token structures like those mimicking OpenAI equity have drawn regulatory scrutiny. The Bank of Lithuania is currently seeking clarification to ensure investor communications are not misleading—a reminder that disclosure and transparency obligations remain critical.
- Risk and Oversight Challenges: The structure of tokenized securities through special purpose vehicles (SPVs) and smart contracts introduces complexities. Regulators in the EU and U.S. may view these instruments differently—MiCA largely excludes financial instruments, leaving questions about whether some tokens fall under MiFID. Meanwhile, in the U.S., the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has yet to provide clear guidance for broad retail access.
- Compliance Readiness: Firms entering this space must be prepared to meet not only AML/KYC standards but also evolving guidance on smart contract security, custody, tax reporting, and investor protection.
- U.S. Implications: While Robinhood’s products are EU-only for now, SEC scrutiny remains a concern, especially if U.S. retail users access these assets indirectly. The SEC has already warned firms against structuring around accredited investor rules. A test case is emerging around whether tokenized access to private equity can be offered without full regulatory registration.
As firms like Robinhood, Ondo Finance, and others push the boundaries of traditional finance, the implications for compliance professionals are clear: staying ahead of regulatory developments, understanding token structures, and ensuring robust controls are no longer optional. Tokenization may be the future of investing, but without clear and proactive compliance strategies, it could also become a flashpoint for regulatory action.
In recent statements by SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce in her July 9, 2025 speech: Enchanting, but Not Magical: A Statement on the Tokenization of Securities
“Blockchain technology has unlocked novel models for distributing and trading securities in a ‘tokenized’ format,” Ms. Peirce said. “As powerful as blockchain technology is, it does not have magical abilities to transform the nature of the underlying asset. Tokenized securities are still securities.”
She goes on to say, “While blockchain-based tokenization is new, the process of issuing an instrument representing a security is not. The same legal requirements apply to on- and off-chain versions of these instruments.”
Summary
Together, the GENIUS Act and the SEC’s new guidance suggest a shift from regulatory ambiguity to an emerging compliance playbook. Firms must prepare for a regulated digital asset future—one that demands internal alignment across treasury, legal, risk, and technology functions. Practical next steps for firms include mapping their current business models to the GENIUS framework, upgrading AML programs to detect blockchain-based obfuscation (e.g., mixers or bridges), auditing custody solutions for key management integrity, and reviewing employee policies on token holdings. Issuers of ETPs, meanwhile, should pre-emptively review disclosures to ensure they meet SEC expectations and prepare governance structures that can demonstrate oversight of digital asset complexity.
“Crypto Week” is more than a branding exercise—it’s a line in the sand. The U.S. is moving from experimentation to enforcement. The expectation is clear: digital asset firms must operate with the same level of scrutiny, transparency, and governance as their traditional financial peers. Compliance officers are now on the front lines of translating legislative and regulatory clarity into actionable internal standards. Those that get ahead of this moment will not only avoid risk but will also position their firms as trusted leaders in a maturing market. The path forward may be complex, but it is no longer uncertain.
Crypto Regulations Decoded
Tools To Navigate What’s Ahead
As regulators shift their focus from setting guidelines to ensuring accountability, firms must be equipped with the right tools to stay aligned with emerging crypto compliance requirements.
StarCompliance (Star) offers specialized Crypto Trading Compliance Software that helps firms meet regulatory expectations, monitor employee crypto activity, and ensure effective oversight. The platform equips compliance officers with the tools needed to manage the complex intersection of digital assets and fiduciary responsibility with confidence.
Key capabilities include:
- Pre-Trade Clearance to review and approve employee crypto trades before execution, including tokenized financial products
- Post-Trade Monitoring that replaces manual reviews and automatically identifies potential violations across more than 100 exchanges and 25 blockchains
- Reporting and Analytics to support internal oversight and deliver automated alerts for risky transactions
With these tools, firms can strengthen controls, protect their reputation, and maintain trust as digital assets take on a larger role in finance. Want to see our Crypto Trading solution in action? Schedule a personalized demo here.
